Economic Plight of America
Interesting email from Phil with a very informative link (see below). Let us not forget that Ron Paul, treated with much disrespect from the mainstream media, has been outspoken regarding the economic plight of the U.S. Ron Paul is the only Presidential Candidate that has brought forth a solution instead of a band-aid.
Thanks to Phil for this link.
the London Times - 1865
“If that mischievous financial policy which had its origin in the North American republic during the late war in that country should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its money without cost.
“It will have all the money that is necessary to carry on its trade and commerce.
“It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized nations of the world. The brain and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That Government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on this globe.”
Find out what the Bankers (with help from politicians) did after the Civil War Here: http://www.mega. nu:8080/ampp/ comingbattle/ cmgbtl.htm
Then the Federal Reserve Act (1913) was the final nail in our coffin. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned Bank ! Those Trillions of National Debt are owed to bankers ! Got any idea what the co-lateral for those Trillions is ?????
CIA Bin Laden Expert: Only Ron Paul Gets It
Michael Scheuer, CIA Bin Laden Expert and former head of the Osama Bin Laden unit appeared on Fox News and Bill O’Reilly’s radioshow promoting his new book, “Marching Towards Hell” and spoke about Terrorism. According to this CIA expert, with the exception of Ron Paul and perhaps Dennis Kucinich, no other presidential candidates understand what motivates terrorism.
While the Mainstream Media blasts Ron Paul as a “kook”, “crackpot” or denouncing him as being unpatriotic, the experts support the Congressman and Presidential Candidates position that it is U.S. Foreign Policy that motivates Islamic terrorism towards the U.S.
Michael Scheuer on O’Reilly’s radioshow: Only Ron Paul Gets It.
Michael Scheuer on Fox News’ H & C: Which Candidate Has The Best Grasp On Fighting The War Terrorism.
Ron Paul Critisizing The World Bank
When You Know The Truth, Shouldn’t You Speak The Truth?
North American Army Created Without OK by Congress
In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.
 U.S. Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, commander of USNORTHCOM, signs agreement Feb. 14, 2008, with Canadian Air Force Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command (USNORTHCOM photo) |
The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to health epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.
Read the article at WorldNetDaily.com
What Changed?
Following this Primary Campaign has opened the eyes of a great many Americans to problems that range from Media Bias to Vote Fraud and has brought people to question the foundation of law this nation is built upon.
Ron Paul has clearly stated, several times, that he is running on a foreign policy platform that George Bush ran on during the 2000 campaign. The Presidents election can be attributed, in part, to this position. Only now we hear that “things have changed” because of 9/11. Actually, 9/11 happened because foreign policy didn’t change. After watching the video below you may wonder if 9/11 would have happened had President Bush lived up to his stated position instead of continuing on the course of intervention. You may also want to ask yourself how it is that in one campaign a candidate can be elected on this foreign policy position and in another campaign a candidate is labeled a “kook” or “space cadet” for standing on the very same position.
Hear President Bush make the same statements that Ron Paul is currently making regarding Foreign Policy and realize that this was the reason for his election to Office of the President. The Media does not hide its disdain for this position when put forth by Ron Paul but had no problem accepting it when put forth by Bush. Why even bother turning on the T.V.??
