Readers of prophecy note that all the nations that Messiah does battle with at the End Times are Islamic. As I’ve posted many times before it is evident that Islam is the Beast spoken of in Biblical Prophecy. What Americans want to know is what will be America’s role in the End Time events. For this answer we can only turn to the Scriptures themselves. There are many different interpretations of these scriptures available. The most plausible are those made by Walid Shoebat. You can find many videos of Walid Shoebat giving lectures on YouTube.
There may be more activity regarding America in the end time events than Walid speaks of. As we see the American government building up its internal law enforcement into military units and, without a doubt, arming itself for internal conflict we suspect that America will be distracted from world events due to this coming conflict within its own borders.
But what sort of internal conflict will America face? We see a never ending tirade regarding “racism” in America. (Mostly one sided.) We see rich and poor also pitted against each other. We see Americans being divided by all things possible: race, economic status, gender, religious belief, political party and the list goes on. But what could possibly happen in America that would bring an armed conflict between the State apparatus and its citizens?
What about the economy? Would economic failure effect all Americans? Yes. Could it be a catalyst to armed confrontation? Yes. Could all the other divisions mentioned above play a part? Yes. And we have much more to consider.
Recent articles suggest a build up of men, machines, food and even anti-virus vaccines all scheduled to be deployed in “Region III” by no later than Oct. 1st. The “men” being deployed are said to be United Nations units. And the call for an anti-virus vaccine being needed and ready by that deadline also suggests a false flag operation of great proportions.
What we might also consider are these facts: The UN is controlled by Islamic nations, most readers would accuse Obama of being Muslim, there are millions of Muslims in America, Eric Holder’s (a Muslim) gun running to Mexican Cartels (and who knows who else he has been arming), the ongoing slaughter of Christians by Muslims and that very fact that the Beast appears to be Islam.
There are many scenarios that can be imagined with these clues. If America is the “greatest fortress” that the anti-christ will rise up against then we cannot exclude a “religious” war right here on our own soil. We cannot exclude our own government turning against Christians – considering all the Muslims now in positions of power within the Obama administration which could take advantage of Executive Orders during this coming emergency. It’s very possible that we will see the rise of Islam in America through the federal government with the assistance of UN troops (most from Islamic nations).
Remember, all it would take is for Islam to cry for the war against America to begin and Muslims across America will rise up to the challenge. If this coming Oct. America experiences something large enough to weaken the nation or the will of the people, Islamists may believe it to be the right time to call for their jihad. In order for America to be the “strongest of fortresses” that throws the anti-Christ into the “pit” – America must overcome the internal conflict to come. Which means the militia in America must overcome the Islamist threat from within.
“Preppies” have had the right idea all along. My suggestion is that all of my readers prepare for a long struggle and be prepared for something big to happen this Oct. Not much time left to prepare and if you haven’t been “prepping” I would suggest that rations be high priority at this time.
When will they stop trying to force this thing down our throats?? Probably never. Once again we will need to call upon our State governments to put this in an early grave.
Here is Ron Paul with information about how they are trying to sneak this ID card into legislation.
Please take note of this paragraph which demonstrates, once again, that guns reduce violent crime:
“The fact is, violence has decreased, safety is up, and the only place you can’t do that is Corps land,” the Oklahoma lawmaker said. “Corps land has more visitors, more rapes, more murders . . . than we ever had in the parks, but we can’t for some reason — for some reason they don’t want us to be able to express our Second Amendment right.”
That’s right. He said that. After reading the article I am not too thrilled with the ass the wrote it.
A statement that caught my eye was this:
“If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates,”
He cannot be serious. It would have “no bearing” on “larger policy debates”??? If that were true then why is it that so many people are trying to tie the bombing in with the 2nd Amendment and Libertarian political activists?
How can this moron deny that if the bomber were a “white anti-government extremist” it would certainly mean MORE surveillance of Americans with the excuse of intercepting “home grown” terrorist attacks?? What kind of idiot thinks that more surveillance and infringing on the rights of Americans will only happen because a “foreigner” or a “muslim” is behind a terrorist attack on American soil?
Sirota definitely has his own agenda motivated by his “anti white man” mindset which blames “white America” for the plight of others.
You can read Sirota’s article HERE… even tho I wouldn’t recommend it. I provide the link for those that would like to take the time to give him a piece of their mind.
The more serious charge being made by much more honest and trustworthy media, which has some credibility, is that the Boston bombing was another “false flag operation” brought to you by one or more of the alphabet soup group.
U.S. Supreme Court
OWEN v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)
445 U.S. 622
OWEN v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, MISSOURI, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Argued January 8, 1980.
Decided April 16, 1980.
A municipality has no immunity from liability under 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good faith of its officers as a defense to such liability. Pp. 635-658.
While reading the above, Owen v. City of Independence, I ran across a footnote that I found particularly interesting.
The footnote indicates that all public servants, elected or appointed, are liable for error when violating a citizens rights under Federal Law. Here, in Footnote 25, we have a unique opinion that makes even LEGISLATORS liable.
[Footnote 25] See, e. g., Globe 305 (remarks of Rep. Arthur) (“But if the Legislature enacts a law, if the Governor enforces it, if the judge upon the bench renders a judgment, if the sheriff levy an execution, execute a writ, serve a summons, or make an arrest, all acting under a solemn, official oath, [445 U.S. 622, 644] though as pure in duty as a saint and as immaculate as a seraph, for a mere error in judgment, they are liable. . .”); id., at 385 (remarks of Rep. Lewis); Globe App. 217 (remarks of Sen. Thurman).
Do you see it? “But if the Legislature enacts a law…” and all that follows… “THEY ARE LIABLE.”
Here is a remedy for every bad law, every encroachment made and liberty stolen. If we hold them liable for what they have done and seek restitution … we may be able to roll back their ever advancing infringement on our rights which are guaranteed by the Supreme Law of the Land: The Constitution.
The public servants that believe they have immunity because they are following some “law” or “regulation” need to be put on notice that there is no such immunity for their error. This can be an important part of our arsenal in the protection of our Liberty. But I believe this process would hinge on specific use of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It would be essential to include all pertinent writings regarding the intent of the founders for the particular right protected in order to establish without doubt that the Federally Protected Right has been violated.
Can State Representatives be held liable for violation of rights protected under Federal Law (the Constitution)? Why not? Could we not hold all responsible and file claim seeking remedy? Could a single case filed against a State Representative result in a recall with a special election? The possibilities are endless.
It is my belief that this could be a greater weapon when used LOCALLY to keep city, town and county public servants in line with the Constitution. As this remedy may be applied much easier locally and as it gains momentum it can then be applied to State officials. But this can be used immediately and effectively in all situations involving Law Enforcement Officers.
Your comments and ideas are appreciated.
A lot of people will be writing in Ron Paul during the general election. There is another choice available to us.
Gary Johnson will be on the ballot.
So, we have a choice to make. Do we keep beating the Ron Paul drum or do we vote for the Libertarian that will appear on the ballot? I would like to hear your input. Should the Ron Paul supporters band together and get the word out for Gary Johnson?
We are at the threshold of a fundamental evolutionary change for mankind. As the articles, movies and pictures posted here have demonstrated, we have been moving towards a one world governing body referred to as The New World Order. There is a solution to the many problems our world faces. Please take the time to view this movie which addresses each of these problems individually, laying out the entire insidious plan for world domination and then reveals the solutions we can implement to change that direction and put an end to the machinations that would steal our Liberty and even our very lives.
For More Information:
Here is what Foreign Policy is and How it works:
On one hand we have the admission by the U.S. that Iran is NOT making nuclear weapons.
See it here:
On the other hand, we may have policy that, is no doubt, extreme meddling in the affairs of a Sovereign Nation.
See it here:
These destructive and violent actions would not occur with a Ron Paul Presidency. This is only one of the reasons he has my support.
The main question to ask is:
Why does the U.S. believe it has the authority to tell other Sovereign Nations what they can and cannot do?
Ron Paul wouldn’t hesitate to tell you that the U.S. has no such authority and that meddling in the affairs of other nations will only result in greater problems in the future.
We all have a choice. We can choose Peace and Freedom or War and Slavery.
A VOTE FOR RON PAUL IS A VOTE FOR PEACE AND FREEDOM.