Please take note of this paragraph which demonstrates, once again, that guns reduce violent crime:
“The fact is, violence has decreased, safety is up, and the only place you can’t do that is Corps land,” the Oklahoma lawmaker said. “Corps land has more visitors, more rapes, more murders . . . than we ever had in the parks, but we can’t for some reason — for some reason they don’t want us to be able to express our Second Amendment right.”
That’s right. He said that. After reading the article I am not too thrilled with the ass the wrote it.
A statement that caught my eye was this:
“If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates,”
He cannot be serious. It would have “no bearing” on “larger policy debates”??? If that were true then why is it that so many people are trying to tie the bombing in with the 2nd Amendment and Libertarian political activists?
How can this moron deny that if the bomber were a “white anti-government extremist” it would certainly mean MORE surveillance of Americans with the excuse of intercepting “home grown” terrorist attacks?? What kind of idiot thinks that more surveillance and infringing on the rights of Americans will only happen because a “foreigner” or a “muslim” is behind a terrorist attack on American soil?
Sirota definitely has his own agenda motivated by his “anti white man” mindset which blames “white America” for the plight of others.
You can read Sirota’s article HERE… even tho I wouldn’t recommend it. I provide the link for those that would like to take the time to give him a piece of their mind.
The more serious charge being made by much more honest and trustworthy media, which has some credibility, is that the Boston bombing was another “false flag operation” brought to you by one or more of the alphabet soup group.
U.S. Supreme Court
OWEN v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)
445 U.S. 622
OWEN v. CITY OF INDEPENDENCE, MISSOURI, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Argued January 8, 1980.
Decided April 16, 1980.
A municipality has no immunity from liability under 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good faith of its officers as a defense to such liability. Pp. 635-658.
While reading the above, Owen v. City of Independence, I ran across a footnote that I found particularly interesting.
The footnote indicates that all public servants, elected or appointed, are liable for error when violating a citizens rights under Federal Law. Here, in Footnote 25, we have a unique opinion that makes even LEGISLATORS liable.
[Footnote 25] See, e. g., Globe 305 (remarks of Rep. Arthur) (“But if the Legislature enacts a law, if the Governor enforces it, if the judge upon the bench renders a judgment, if the sheriff levy an execution, execute a writ, serve a summons, or make an arrest, all acting under a solemn, official oath, [445 U.S. 622, 644] though as pure in duty as a saint and as immaculate as a seraph, for a mere error in judgment, they are liable. . .”); id., at 385 (remarks of Rep. Lewis); Globe App. 217 (remarks of Sen. Thurman).
Do you see it? “But if the Legislature enacts a law…” and all that follows… “THEY ARE LIABLE.”
Here is a remedy for every bad law, every encroachment made and liberty stolen. If we hold them liable for what they have done and seek restitution … we may be able to roll back their ever advancing infringement on our rights which are guaranteed by the Supreme Law of the Land: The Constitution.
The public servants that believe they have immunity because they are following some “law” or “regulation” need to be put on notice that there is no such immunity for their error. This can be an important part of our arsenal in the protection of our Liberty. But I believe this process would hinge on specific use of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It would be essential to include all pertinent writings regarding the intent of the founders for the particular right protected in order to establish without doubt that the Federally Protected Right has been violated.
Can State Representatives be held liable for violation of rights protected under Federal Law (the Constitution)? Why not? Could we not hold all responsible and file claim seeking remedy? Could a single case filed against a State Representative result in a recall with a special election? The possibilities are endless.
It is my belief that this could be a greater weapon when used LOCALLY to keep city, town and county public servants in line with the Constitution. As this remedy may be applied much easier locally and as it gains momentum it can then be applied to State officials. But this can be used immediately and effectively in all situations involving Law Enforcement Officers.
Your comments and ideas are appreciated.
A lot of people will be writing in Ron Paul during the general election. There is another choice available to us.
Gary Johnson will be on the ballot.
So, we have a choice to make. Do we keep beating the Ron Paul drum or do we vote for the Libertarian that will appear on the ballot? I would like to hear your input. Should the Ron Paul supporters band together and get the word out for Gary Johnson?
We are at the threshold of a fundamental evolutionary change for mankind. As the articles, movies and pictures posted here have demonstrated, we have been moving towards a one world governing body referred to as The New World Order. There is a solution to the many problems our world faces. Please take the time to view this movie which addresses each of these problems individually, laying out the entire insidious plan for world domination and then reveals the solutions we can implement to change that direction and put an end to the machinations that would steal our Liberty and even our very lives.
For More Information:
Here is what Foreign Policy is and How it works:
On one hand we have the admission by the U.S. that Iran is NOT making nuclear weapons.
See it here:
On the other hand, we may have policy that, is no doubt, extreme meddling in the affairs of a Sovereign Nation.
See it here:
These destructive and violent actions would not occur with a Ron Paul Presidency. This is only one of the reasons he has my support.
The main question to ask is:
Why does the U.S. believe it has the authority to tell other Sovereign Nations what they can and cannot do?
Ron Paul wouldn’t hesitate to tell you that the U.S. has no such authority and that meddling in the affairs of other nations will only result in greater problems in the future.
We all have a choice. We can choose Peace and Freedom or War and Slavery.
A VOTE FOR RON PAUL IS A VOTE FOR PEACE AND FREEDOM.
Here are a clips from 2 interviews that Ron Paul did after the NH second place finish.
[Note: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama finished second place in NH on their way to winning.]
“Don’t try to put words in my mouth!” LOL!
And here’s a bonus video regarding vote fraud in NH:
I’ve railed about the MSM and their dirty tricks. Even the apology supports the fact that they did this on purpose. Watch both videos:
So, it’s “anyone but Mitt”, eh? Let’s look at what we got: Gingrich as “frontrunner”? Considering his comparison to Cain, with all his personal problems – which forced Cain to bow out – how can Newt hold on to this sudden surge in the polls? With two affairs and failed marriages it’s hard to believe that people are going to give Newt a pass on this when Cain could not get one … regardless of the fact that the Mainstream media seems to be doing just that.
The comparison between Gingrich and Romney holds no stark contrast. It’s more like looking at twins considering they are both huge Flip Floppers !! Since all the information regarding Romney’s flips have come out he’s declined heavily in the polls. And Newt should meet the same fate as the information regarding his flip flops becomes more widely known. That is being helped by Ron Pauls new “attack” ad. Which seems a bit out of character for the Congressman but understandable when taking into account Newts machinations to keep Ron Paul from winning election to Congress when Paul had decided to return to the political arena. What is disturbing about Newts flip flops compared to Mitt’s is that the flips are much more recent.
As I watched the news today with all the talk about where Cain’s supporters were going to go – particularly in light of the “anyone but Mitt” condition – I heard Santorums name mentioned. Not one mention of the only other candidate with double digits in the polls: Ron Paul. Rick Santorum tied with Michelle Bachman at 6% whereas Ron Paul took 2nd with 16%. The talking heads went on and on about how Cains supporters were looking for someone that wasn’t “main stream” and didn’t fit the “status quo”, someone “outside the box”. And there were, of course, the many mentions of the “Tea Party” as has become common these days.
The media states that Herman Cains supporters do not want “more of the same”. Romney represents that “same ol’ song and dance” that has been strangling them for decades. At first, Gingrich seemed like a good alternative. But after being reminded of Newts true stance on many of the important issues he falls far short of being someone “outside the box” and resonates a tune more akin the “status quo”. Even Rick Santorum falls into that niche very nicely.
“What about the lovely Michelle Bachman?”, you inquire? It’s nothing personal … but I think her shrill and whiny voice is the biggest turn off. It’s hard to fathom this woman as a strong leader. As someone that will do what must be done to protect the borders and the security of the nation. As easy going as Ron Paul demonstrates himself to be, you might be inclined to think the same of him. Have no fear in this regard. Even though the MSM reiterates the same old accusation of Paul being an isolationist – which is far from the truth – there is no need to fear that, as President, Ron Paul would be too timid to take necessary military action. He was, after all, a military man. (Note: Paul is supported by more military personnel than all other candidates COMBINED.)
So, where are all the Cain supporters going to go? Isn’t it obvious? They are jumping on the Ron Paul bandwagon. Congressman Paul has been an “outsider” his entire political career. The Congressman has never wavered in his position on the issues for the last 30 plus years and has demonstrated that not only in speech but by his record. This is a man of integrity. And that resonates well with Cains supporters and all self proclaimed Tea Party activists (which were born from Congressman Pauls 2008 Presidential bid).
Will Iowa and other early primary voting states hold a surprise for the GOP and the nation? Will we see an end to the Gingrich surge and a rise of the “Limited Government” Libertarian Congressman from Texas? All signs seem to point in that direction.